From 3bb148ebbc1c8eae47d1f00ab60e68a041289cb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Phil Miller Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 13:43:38 -0700 Subject: Move handling of do_not_deposit to physics callers (#3225) * Rearrange in preparation for lifting do_not_deposit higher in the call stack * Make do_not_deposit public, so callers can test on it * Make all DepositCharge call sites respect WarpXParticleContainer::do_not_deposit * Drop check for do_not_deposit in DepositCharge * Fix comment to accurately describe np_to_depose * Fix logic to account for other logic in AddSpaceChargeField * Match zero charge density array to filled array in RZ PSATD case * Structure control flow per @dpgrote's preference * Reword comment for clarity --- Source/Python/WarpXWrappers.cpp | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'Source/Python') diff --git a/Source/Python/WarpXWrappers.cpp b/Source/Python/WarpXWrappers.cpp index f2855a145..2df989bba 100644 --- a/Source/Python/WarpXWrappers.cpp +++ b/Source/Python/WarpXWrappers.cpp @@ -626,6 +626,7 @@ namespace { const long np = pti.numParticles(); auto& wp = pti.GetAttribs(PIdx::w); + // Do this unconditionally, ignoring myspc.do_not_deposit, to support diagnostic uses myspc.DepositCharge(pti, wp, nullptr, rho_fp, 0, 0, np, 0, lev, lev); } #ifdef WARPX_DIM_RZ -- cgit v1.2.3