diff options
| author |  homunkulus <homunkulus@gmx.com>
| 2017-12-09 13:47:10 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | homunkulus <homunkulus@gmx.com>
| 2017-12-09 13:47:10 +0000 |
| commit | 0a0e0e2b382d826ac7b423c91f39d2abf91a010f (patch) | |
| tree | 5b4e2a8c3319f73a2e74a0ea498067f72c560dc3 /src/examples/_2_two_tasks.rs | |
| parent | e78ca98c42a2af1ca9c04d176441b045cd5e8c65 (diff) | |
| parent | 512091e8a36a4e561500be81533516736ec49340 (diff) | |
| download | rtic-0a0e0e2b382d826ac7b423c91f39d2abf91a010f.tar.gz rtic-0a0e0e2b382d826ac7b423c91f39d2abf91a010f.tar.zst rtic-0a0e0e2b382d826ac7b423c91f39d2abf91a010f.zip | |
Auto merge of #55 - japaric:late-resources, r=japaric
[RFC] rename LateResourceValues to LateResources
After writing `LateResourceValues` several times I now think it's too long to type. I'd like that
struct to be renamed to `LateResources`. I don't think there would be a loss in readability with the
rename because you can think of "late resources" as resources that "don't exist" until `init` ends
instead of as resources that are not initialized after `init` ends -- the second meaning maps better
to `LateResourceValues`.
This would be a breaking-change but we are moving to v0.3.0 due to #50 in any case.
cc jonas-schievink
Diffstat (limited to 'src/examples/_2_two_tasks.rs')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions